What Do I Do When Teachers Depend Too Much on Me for Leadership?

by Evelyn Cortez-Ford

A group of teachers and the principal assemble for their weekly School Leadership Team meeting to plan for an upcoming professional development day focused on reading strategies. The principal begins by handing out the agenda, which includes outcomes, times, and tasks. As is customary, the team starts with "reasons to celebrate" -- a ritual the principal embedded into the meetings in hopes of inspiring participation and pride. Surprisingly, nobody seems ready to share, so the principal takes a turn by saying... "

Our staff has become more data savvy. Our decision to focus our professional development time on reading strategies came straight from the data." After everyone has a chance to share their reasons to celebrate, the principal proceeds with the agenda by taking input and guidance from teachers. After the meeting, the principal feels that teachers weren't fully participating as leaders. Instead, teachers were depending too much on her for leadership. She wonders why and what can be done about it.

SIGNS TEACHERS ARE DISENGAGED FROM LEADERSHIP
When teachers and principals share leadership they are charting a new course. As a community of leaders it can be difficult to know how to proceed. By default everyone falls into old ways of working. Signs that teachers depend too much on the principal for leadership include:
Teachers defer to the principal to make decisions.
Teachers wait to hear the principal's opinion before voicing their own.
Teachers seem stuck in inaction.
Teachers aren't exercising their authority.
Principals should be aware of shifts in participation and attitudes. Once aware they must understand the possible causes.

REASONS TEACHERS DISENGAGE FROM LEADERSHIP
It is not unusual from time to time for teachers to disengage from leadership activities. In fact, until teacher leadership becomes common practice in schools, disengagement is likely. Below are common reasons teachers disengage from leadership.

Traditional ideas of leadership. Teachers' active resistance to leadership may be due to traditional notions of leadership that don't fit well with the culture of teaching. They may view a leader as the lone person "in charge," someone who is the "boss" or "supervisor." Ideas that leaders need an authoritarian, command-and-control personality may cause teachers to reject leadership.

Lack of trust. Teacher leadership requires that both teachers and principals develop new ways of working based on trust. Trusting relationships are marked by open and honest communication, commitment to follow through, and fairness. If teachers don't trust that their leadership efforts will be valued, they will not participate.

Role confusion. When teachers become leaders they must straddle the line between teaching and leading activities. Striking a balance between responsibilities can be difficult, and teachers may fall back on their teacher-only role. Teachers may depend too much on the principal for leadership for a variety of reasons. Fortunately principals can inspire full teacher-leader participation by establishing shared agreements.